I've been waiting for this for a long time, another good scifi horror in the vein of seminal classic: "Alien."
Is this movie going to live up to expectations? - Probably a near impossible task but at least the right name is at the helm.
First the above roughly 1 minute long trailer was released, quickly followed up by several more, I count at least 4 distinctly different trailers (though showing much the same thing)
"Imax" version
We also have the "international" version, which shows a few more extra snippets and is probably the definitive version of the trailer so far.
Warning: Conjectural spoilers Ahoy!
I've noticed one or two comments about whether this is the real movie, I guess there is always the chance it could have been some (VERY) elaborate fake to highlight some unknown FX team, and maybe that says more about the quality that amateurs and low budgets are capable of attaining with CGI than anything, but there is something a little minimalist about it.
Maybe a reason why some commenter's found it a little unconvincing is that there is perhaps something a little in-congruent about the visuals combined with the more minimalist style of the first trailer: The landscape in particular, Archeron's moon and Furina were the settings for the first 3 Alien movies; with the formers twilight cold and twisting (albeit plaster cast and matte) landscape and the latters fiery junk-yard, they maybe don't hold up so well today, but really looked like another world. Much of the Prometheus trailer appears - as in [I]classic [/I]Dr Who style - to be set in a quarry, abeit a very large quarry.
![]() |
A shot from the upcoming eagerly anticipated sequel to Joss Whedon's Serenity featuring a much larger Firefly mk2... Oh sorry, I mean Ridley Scott's eagerly antic... |
I'll be honest I'm really disappointed that I probably wont be feasting my eyes on a fully realised Giger designed world of epic scale with fully realised bio-mechanical cities. This is all of course merely dressing, but part of the spectacle that make the classics so memorable.
What we can perhaps glean from this with regards to the story is that as well as looking a little bland in comparison, it perhaps indicates that the planet is simply an outpost, infact it may be Archerons moon / LV-426 - the planet on which all the trouble began in 1979. Contrary to this analysis, the colour of the air and so on don't seem to indicate that planets 'Primordial' atmospheric soup, and there are lots of other things to suggest that its not quite the same place.
I hope that not too much is set outdoors as the interiors and sets look fantastic, holding true to Alien in just the right way and clearly suggest this is the real deal. In the human spacecraft, the layout of the soft cushioned panels and lines of the bulkheads are evocative of the Ron Cobb designed set, originally built at Shepperton studios in the late 1970's and long since destroyed. The alien interiors are equally loyal to Giger's original concepts built for the Alien movie, and indeed for this aspect they may just be illustrating the exact same ship, or at least the same class of craft as that found derelict on LV-426 - if our quarry planet is the same place then its likely the same ship.
If it is the same place then the crew of Prometheus are far better equipped than the explorers who came later, whether these vehicles shown below will have the same kind of lasting appeal as the classic designs like the Colonial Marine vehicles from Aliens remains to be seen - or perhaps I simply can't see a thing behind my near opaquely rose tinted welding goggles.
![]() |
Mostly looks like the set of Bladerunner... Mostly. |
![]() |
A beautiful backlit shot of a spectacularly seamless effect, but a very Earth-like world is revealed from behind the cargo door, also, needs more Giger.... |
Interviews with Ridley Scott from decade old alien DVD extras perhaps reveal some of the overall plot of this new movie. In particular his comments that the derelict spacecraft in Alien is in essence a 'bomber' or a 'carrier'. Both military terms for a weapon which will drop the eggs to infest and destroy potentially competing civilisations. The Xenomorphs that are produced from the infected population are presumably just the right size to both deal with that population and also fit the structures that the population created; your genetic weapon is useless if it doesn't fit through the target civilisations doorways. Crucially, the Xenomorph as an imperialist weapons system, like a neutron bomb or a biological plague, leaves those doorways and other infrastructure intact. Though if using that infrastructure is important, who then exterminates the bugs so that it becomes usable?
Maybe these guys also made the Yautja to fulfill that very role (i really hope not;))
This is what I think gives a real purpose to the facehugger concept: Beyond the parasitic, sexual horror aspects it autonomously ensures that you can seed many worlds with the same weapon and have it deal equally well on a physical basis with all sorts of populations. Anything that we would typically consider a humanoid or animal species that a facehugger can wrap itself around and snake a tube down. It seems apparent after analysis of the trailer footage that perhaps here we might see a different creature with a similar parasitic, reproductive purpose. I have not spotted any Xenomorphs or facehuggers beyond a slightly suspicious looking pile of parts in one shot - a shot which otherwise appears to reveal nothing at all. And I think there are several reasons why they are not in this movie, and which might partly because related demographic concerns as much as anything. It certainly seems that while the tone is very similar to the Alien movies, and certain elements remain, other elements have been quitely dropped or replaced with other, perhaps less offensive things... More about that later.
So the Space Jockeys (or is it Spacejockeys?) are considered (though never explained in canon) masters of genetic manipulation, and this has been a constant theme throughout the Aliens franchise. Combined with this, the "Ancient Aliens" theme, much derided in the most recent Indiana Jones is apparently in full effect here, and the story will likely deal with issues regarding creation myths and perhap the realisation that Humans, Jockeys and Xeno's are more closely linked than had previously been suggested.
In the legend Prometheus defied the gods and drew their anger, with a theft of information as much as anything, Our Human participants in this story logically would occupy the role of Prometheus, so does that make the Alien Space Jockeys the Gods? Note that in one of the scenes a large human face is built into one of the sets and its not just an excuse to put another giger designed set into the movie. The face is a set peice in a room filled with identical vaguely egg shaped canisters... Perhaps containing Human, umm, stuff? Or whatever that ooze is... something specifically meant for the humans? Clearly something was there, waiting to be found by humans (as one of the characters says in the extended trailer - "it's more of an invite")
to sum up so far, for those brave souls who have ventured thusfar into this impossibly long winded post I now present the plot of Prometheus revealed! with pictures, and for extra fun, I'll turn to my good friend Erich "Ancient Aliens" Von Daniken. No stranger to speculation about the various otherworldly creatures who have visited mankind, remember he merely asks questions...
Has these alien species known to Alien franchise fans as "The Space Jockeys", masters of genetic manipulation; long ago created man or perhaps interfered with life on this planet? - I ask the question and science does not respond.
![]() |
A Space Jockey craft lurking in the fog over this waterfall? Is this Earth? There is vegetation visible in this shot (though barely visible due to lighting and heavy colour processing) |
Supporting this theories, at the beginning of the long trailer we see a large object, a Oo-FO type thing with an apparently irregular but overall oval shape hovering over a waterfall, we also see a man, he must be a primitive man, perhaps twenty to thirty-thousand years old and science cannot disprove this. He is unprotected with no visible technology or clothings standing near the same waterfall with some strange 'things' crawling around under his skin. I ask the question that science refuses to answer; Do these things have relatings? is this the start of the genetic manipulations or some kind of software update for the DNA, like my laptop? It no longer works after apple update and SCIENCE insists it will not assist me in fixing it unless I switch to a real computer.
Was this perhaps to a create new weapons systems, or something that would benefit these aliens, or as we, as primitives would call them, the Gods who came from the skies.
I suggest that which science will plainly not accept today; that they not only created us but left big clues behind to show *US*, where the ancient libraries may be hidden
![]() |
Some kind of clue? A Scientist when stopped in the street and asked this exact question in a made up alien language refused to confirm, or even deny... |
I ask the obvious question, is this the obvious trap? Science feels ostracised and misunderstood.
It appears that the planet is not the seat of their civilisation and never was. For some reason this alien equipment was left there so that any race discovering it would be destroyed autonomatically and therefore would we would never be capable of threatening the Gods of our ancestors. They are fearful of us as science fears the truths!
![]() |
God? - Erich |
Once Humans awaken the facility everything for them seems to go badly wrong, is it a sign that we have become too advanced to be easily controlled by our gods? Or a sign that their experiment is concluded? Science again is timid and uncooperative.

The final ramming of the ship of the gods with the Human ship indicates what science stubbornly resists confirming, that it is a very good day to die.
Prometheus seems to tell a tale of similar scope to 2001, perhaps the first movie to deal with the Theme of Ancient Aliens, but the outcome is not so much about expanding our perceptions through a spiritual transformation or merely alerting the creators, but perhaps just automatically killing the Humans for knowing too much or becoming too powerful. Or, possibly like 2001, rather than destroy the Humans with the bomber, its purpose is genetic alteration which also is clearly not desirable to the bulk of the films surviving characters at that point. But really I'm not keen on the concept of luring humans somewhere, under their own power just to see if they can do it and offing them if they do, it would see at that point the cat is out of the bag anyway, so rather than destroy it implies a more complex relationship which ties back in with themes of genetic manipulation.
There is certainly an aspect of mutation implied in the trailer (duh!) of the characters physically becoming something different, clearly shown at several points it's likely that at least one Human is transformed into what has been commonly thought of as a different species, the Space Jockey, and therefore there might be an entirely different class of species running the whole show.
I wonder if there will be some sort of dialogue between the Human characters and what appears at one point to be an alive Space Jockey, are they the gods of this plot or simply a transformed human puppet?
![]() |
Alien infection or an application of Tan-in-a-Can gone horribly wrong? |
![]() |
A mutated Humanoid strides toward an empty navigators seat. |
Despite any reservations about how it fits with other stuff, the possible cliches in the plot, the trailer clearly represents a mystery and the movie will hopefully enrich a classic franchise while not really being a part of it, or something. I just hope there is a really interesting story as Prometheus so far looks like the grand adventure, more than the "Seven Little Indians" of Alien but seems to tread some of the same ground, albeit in a slightly different form. I've had no doubt all along that this movie would be very closely tied with the Aliens films and perhaps Ridley being somewhat evasive (and even continuing to be) about this is more political than anything or he's simply having some fun.
I hope that with solving some of the mysteries surrounding the Jockey ship as the movie appears bound to do, it doesn't detract at all from the earlier sequels by spoiling what remains of the air of mysticism that has always surrounded the series. Alien is an important movie and quickly became part of our modern culture, its slick style and slogans like: "In space, no one can hear you scream" emulated by all sorts of imitators. One of the great enduring things about it, keeping the orginal movie relevant as with 2001, is that not all is explained and discussions between fans of what the creatures really are and where they really come from will perhaps be eroded or obliterated by a new reality imposed on the audience by this movie. Many preconcieved notions of these creatures origins by long term fans will have to be thrown out of the window as it inevitably narrows a wide range of possibility into one definate mythology - indeed already has with the recent trailers. This aspect has been completely untouched in the canon for as long as the franchise has existed, safe from the fumbling hands and strange ideas of the incompetants who were involved in making the later movies the low rent souless movie trash that they truely were. Fitting then, that if this has to be done; if the gods of studio economics feel the world is ready to cash out to see such a work, that it is the seminal director for Alien who will now expand upon on these ideas that he originally helped to craft and who will finally be held responsible if it turns out to be awful. I also feel that Sir Ridley Scott offers the production considerably more weight than any other director could possibly give it, which should improve its acceptance with the long term fans who seem to be enthralled with how this is developing.
Ultimately I think its something that most fans of the Aliens series will want to see even if just to learn more of the backstory to Alien, but then if you're all the way down here in this post then you already knew that, what are you; desperate for a decent sci-fi movie or something? Well its not like hopes have been dashed before about a prequel movie... *cough* Phantom Menace *cough* I'm not being too cynical when I say the movie is being crafted to make money, it is being crafted to suit a much wider audience than Alien, thats just logical, movie making in hollywood is a business so it stands to reason that investors want a large return on their investment. I'm sure no one really knew how Alien was going to turn out and the studio mostly thought it would flop, how wrong they were.
As suggested by retired Fox executive Sandy Lieberson in one of Dennis Lowe's excellent "Alien Makers" documentaries, back in the late 70's, movies were not crafted so much by demographics as they were today. Even large budget "A" feature movies were apparently still created as more of an art than a science. Infact as it turned out, while a popular franchise, even the most popular editions of the Alien saga never attained universal popularity as Star Wars or other less edgy productions because certain demographic groups utterly hated the entire series. I'm pretty sure this is one great reason why we wont see any face rape, explosive birthing fatalities or overtly penis headed monsters in this movie: Facehuggers with suggestive features are now worm like snakes that burrow under the skin and instead of skinny tall aliens with ribbed wang shaped craniums we are apparently presented with mutating Humans, which presumably aren't going to end up looking like the Xenos in shape for the aforementioned reasons. But these things still perhaps fill roughly the same sorts of roles as the earlier entities.
Of course there is that thing apparently built into a wall, but even that has had the shape altered and is clearly not a Xenomorph, but like the Xenomorph, follows the same 'Necronom' pattern, as developed by Giger prior to working on the first movie.
As movies have sought to cast a wider and wider net over the last few decades, and how to do this through analysis of demographics and focus groups over an additional 30 years (of successive topping of box office records) they have perhaps naturally become dumbed down, in order to not offend a particular group or appear off putting. Now more than 30 years later, can Prometheus tick all the demographic boxes needed to pull in a fresh audience, make it successful for the studio while also satisfying the fans and not completely ruin the back story to a popular pre-existing series backstory in the process? Should you or science care if it has the "Aliens" or not in it? No, not a bit as that aspect has already been done to death, cloned from some skin cells and after several failed attempts is now reborn as
I'll finish with a link to trailer of the 1979 classic Alien, back from the era when extra stuff was shot just for the trailer it seems, including what resembles an Ostrich or Dinosaur egg on a cracked plaster moonscape which looks nothing like the actual thing in the movie. No doubt to keep the actual egg it fresh for when you actually paid up (hope they put it in the fridge! ho ho ho).
No comments:
Post a Comment